Ethereum RPC endpoints: free public URLs and private API-key providers by latency
RPCsAlchemy
Trails12 ms
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 48provisional
GetBlock
Leads11 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 48provisional
Alchemy leads on 7 of 17 shared benchmarks, GetBlock on 10. Alchemy wins on Hyperliquid RPC endpoints (14 ms vs 158 ms), Robinhood Chain RPC endpoints (12 ms vs 14 ms), Arc RPC endpoints (11 ms vs 16 ms), Cheapest RPC provider, priced per workload across 19 providers ($125.48 vs $150). GetBlock wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (11 ms vs 12 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (11 ms vs 13 ms), Base RPC endpoints (10 ms vs 12 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (12 ms vs 14 ms). Data as of 2026-11-15 UTC.
Web3 infrastructure provider offering NFT API, RPC nodes, and blockchain data APIs. Multi-chain EVM coverage.
Multi-chain RPC provider covering 130+ networks, billed in Compute Units. Keyed JSON-RPC runs on shared nodes with the serving region selectable between New York, Frankfurt and Singapore. Cost is a chain multiplier times a method multiplier, with archive priced from an independent column rather than as a fixed surcharge.
Alchemy
Trails12 ms
GetBlock
Leads11 ms
Alchemy
Trails13 ms
GetBlock
Leads11 ms
Alchemy
Trails12 ms
GetBlock
Leads10 ms
Alchemy
Trails14 ms
GetBlock
Leads12 ms
Alchemy
Trails13 ms
GetBlock
Leads12 ms
Alchemy
Trails33 ms
GetBlock
Leads20 ms
Alchemy
Leads14 ms
GetBlock
Trails158 ms
Alchemy
Leads12 ms
GetBlock
Trails14 ms
Alchemy
Leads11 ms
GetBlock
Trails16 ms
| Provider | Monthly cost, dapp mix at 10M requests | Effective cost per 1M requests | Billing units per request | Free tier, requests per month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alchemyprovisional | $125.48 | $12.55 | 24 | 1.26M |
| GetBlockprovisional | $150 | $19.90 | 20 | 75.0K |
Published prices, not invoices. Each figure is human-verified against the provider's own pricing page or API and carries the date it was read; the harness re-hashes 20 of those pages on a loop to catch an upstream edit. A 30-day month and flat traffic are assumed, the most generous reading. NOWNodes prices in EUR. A provider absent from a cell is not missing data: it has no plan that can serve that workload, usually a cap or a throughput ceiling rather than the price.
Alchemy
Leads1.26M
GetBlock
Trails75.0K
Allowance, not latency and not reliability. A plan that buys the most requests is not thereby the fastest or the most correct; those are measured on the per-chain RPC pages. Published allowances, human-verified against each provider's own pricing page with the date it was read. A free plan is one that costs nothing and renews, so Quicknode's one-month trial is not here. Where a provider publishes a daily cap it is multiplied by 30.
Alchemy
Leads55.4 %
GetBlock
Trails18.1 %
Per region
| Region | Alchemy | GetBlock |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 13.2% | 50.5% |
| EU-West | 82.0% | 2.51% |
| Singapore | 70.9% | 1.42% |
Alchemy
Trails0.067 %
GetBlock
Leads0.25 %
Per region
| Region | Alchemy | GetBlock |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 0.0042% | 0.0028% |
| EU-West | 0.046% | 0.21% |
| Singapore | 0.15% | 0.53% |
Alchemy
Leads23.2 %
GetBlock
Trails4.38 %
Per region
| Region | Alchemy | GetBlock |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 0.21% | 2.89% |
| EU-West | 29.7% | 1.28% |
| Singapore | 39.7% | 8.98% |
Alchemy
Trails1.74 %
GetBlock
Leads13.1 %
Per region
| Region | Alchemy | GetBlock |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 0.16% | 18.5% |
| EU-West | 0.010% | 13.6% |
| Singapore | 5.20% | 6.70% |
Alchemy
Trails0.66 %
GetBlock
Leads60.1 %
Per region
| Region | Alchemy | GetBlock |
|---|---|---|
| EU-West | 1.02% | 61.0% |
Alchemy
Trails0.58 %
GetBlock
Leads9.09 %
Per region
| Region | Alchemy | GetBlock |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 1.44% | 18.2% |
| EU-West | 0.24% | 0.021% |
Alchemy and GetBlock are compared on 17 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Alchemy leads on Hyperliquid RPC endpoints. GetBlock leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Hyperliquid RPC endpoints benchmark, Alchemy leads at 14 ms (provisional) versus GetBlock at 158 ms (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.