Hyperliquid RPC endpoints: free public URLs and private API-key providers by latency
RPCsAlchemy
Leads34 ms
- p99
- 94 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,214
RouteMesh
Trails271 ms
- p99
- 681 ms
- rank
- —
- samples
- 1,347
RPC latency
Alchemyn/aRouteMeshn/a
Alchemy vs RouteMesh
Alchemy leads on both live benchmarks. Alchemy wins on Hyperliquid RPC endpoints (34 ms vs 271 ms), Robinhood Chain RPC endpoints (32 ms vs 276 ms). Data as of 2026-10-29 UTC.
Alchemy
Web3 infrastructure provider offering NFT API, RPC nodes, and blockchain data APIs. Multi-chain EVM coverage.
Side by side measurements
Robinhood Chain RPC endpoints: free public URLs and private API-key providers by latency
RPCsAlchemy
Leads32 ms
- p99
- 384 ms
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 1,489
RouteMesh
Trails276 ms
- p99
- 668 ms
- rank
- —
- samples
- 1,349
RPC latency
Alchemyn/aRouteMeshn/a
Frequently asked questions
Alchemy vs RouteMesh: which one is better?
Alchemy and RouteMesh are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Alchemy leads on Hyperliquid RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Alchemy or RouteMesh?
On the Hyperliquid RPC endpoints benchmark, Alchemy leads at 34 ms versus RouteMesh at 271 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Alchemy vs RouteMesh comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.