Ankr vs OnFinality

Ankr leads on the only live benchmark. Ankr wins on Fastest free Stellar Soroban RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (320 ms vs 339 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Ankr logo
Ankr

Multi-chain RPC service covering 65+ chains on the freemium tier. One API key across chains; some networks are premium-gated.

OnFinality logo
OnFinality

Multi-chain infrastructure provider. Public keyless endpoints on 80+ networks with generous daily limits, plus dedicated and API-key tiers.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ankr vs OnFinality: which one is better?

Ankr and OnFinality are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ankr leads on Fastest free Stellar Soroban RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Ankr or OnFinality?

On the Fastest free Stellar Soroban RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, Ankr leads at 320 ms versus OnFinality at 339 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ankr vs OnFinality comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.