Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingApeX Omni
Trails$430.47M
- p99
- $435.10M
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 2,880
GRVT
Leads$433.85M
- p99
- $489.83M
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 2,880
GRVT leads on all 3 live benchmarks. GRVT wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($433.85M vs $430.47M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (194 vs 126), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.902x vs 2.75x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
ApeX is an orderbook perpetuals exchange (ApeX Omni, formerly ApeX Pro) with omnichain deposits and off-chain matching. APEX is the protocol token.
zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.
ApeX Omni
Trails$430.47M
GRVT
Leads$433.85M
ApeX Omni
Trails126
GRVT
Leads194
ApeX Omni
Trails2.75x
GRVT
Leads0.902x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
ApeX Omni and GRVT are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GRVT leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GRVT leads at $433.85M versus ApeX Omni at $430.47M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.