ApeX Omni vs Ostium

ApeX Omni leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Ostium on 2. ApeX Omni wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (126 vs 83). Ostium wins on Perp DEX asset breadth (74 vs 40), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.149x vs 2.75x). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks, 3 measured on both sides
ApeX Omni logo
ApeX Omni

ApeX is an orderbook perpetuals exchange (ApeX Omni, formerly ApeX Pro) with omnichain deposits and off-chain matching. APEX is the protocol token.

Ostium logo
Ostium

Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

ApeX Omni

Trails

40

p99
40
rank
#10
samples
2,880

Ostium

Leads

74

p99
74
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
ApeX Omnin/aOstiumn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderFees 30dRevenue 30dOpen interestFees / OI
ApeX Omni$373.7K$186.9K$78.90M0.058x
Ostium$34.3K$27.6K$10.77M0.039x
View
ApeX Omnin/aOstiumn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

ApeX Omni

Trails

2.75x

p99
2.77x
rank
#18
samples
2,880

Ostium

Leads

0.149x

p99
0.276x
rank
#2
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
ApeX Omnin/aOstiumn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

ApeX Omni vs Ostium: which one is better?

ApeX Omni and Ostium are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. ApeX Omni leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ostium leads on Perp DEX asset breadth. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, ApeX Omni or Ostium?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, ApeX Omni leads at 126 versus Ostium at 83. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher non-crypto markets, ApeX Omni or Ostium?

On the Perp DEX asset breadth benchmark, Ostium leads at 74 versus ApeX Omni at 40. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the ApeX Omni vs Ostium comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.