Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesArbitrum
Leads17.1 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 29provisional
Celo
Trails20.0 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 2provisional
Arbitrum leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Celo on 1. Arbitrum wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (17.1 min vs 20.0 min), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (22.1 min vs 27.5 min). Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (13.72 s vs 25.07 s).
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Arbitrum
Leads17.1 min
Celo
Trails20.0 min
Arbitrum
Trails17.8 min
Celo
No data in window
Arbitrum
Trails25.07 s
Celo
Leads13.72 s
Arbitrum
Leads22.1 min
Celo
Trails27.5 min
Arbitrum and Celo are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Arbitrum leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Arbitrum leads at 17.1 min (provisional) versus Celo at 20.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 13.72 s (provisional) versus Arbitrum at 25.07 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.