Arbitrum vs Celo

Arbitrum leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Celo on 1. Arbitrum wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (17.1 min vs 20.0 min), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (22.1 min vs 27.5 min). Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (13.72 s vs 25.07 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Arbitrum logo
Arbitrum

Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Arbitrum vs Celo: which one is better?

Arbitrum and Celo are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Arbitrum leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Arbitrum or Celo?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Arbitrum leads at 17.1 min (provisional) versus Celo at 20.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Arbitrum or Celo?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 13.72 s (provisional) versus Arbitrum at 25.07 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Arbitrum vs Celo comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.