Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails1050.00 min
- p99
- 1768.80 s
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 26
Ink
Leads10.00 s
- p99
- 14.90 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2
Arbitrum vs Ink
Arbitrum leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Ink on 2. Arbitrum wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (27.94 s vs 52.50 s). Ink wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (10.00 s vs 1050.00 s), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.00 s vs 12.53 s).
Arbitrum
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails1050.00 min
- p99
- 1197.00 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 4
Ink
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Leads27.94 s
- p99
- 1730.53 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 440
Ink
Trails52.50 s
- p99
- 59.86 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 1
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Trails12.53 s
- p99
- 54.70 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 106
Ink
Leads10.00 s
- p99
- 14.91 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2
Frequently asked questions
Arbitrum vs Ink: which one is better?
Arbitrum and Ink are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Arbitrum leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Ink leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Arbitrum or Ink?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Arbitrum leads at 27.94 s versus Ink at 52.50 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Arbitrum or Ink?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Ink leads at 10.00 s versus Arbitrum at 1050.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Arbitrum vs Ink comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.