Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails1067.65 min
- p99
- 1773.00 s
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 27
Monad
Leads4.06 s
- p99
- 9.82 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 22
Arbitrum vs Monad
Arbitrum leads on 0 of 3 shared benchmarks, Monad on 3. Monad wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.06 s vs 1067.65 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (90.00 s vs 1050.00 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (23.00 s vs 27.64 s).
Arbitrum
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails1050.00 min
- p99
- 1197.00 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 4
Monad
Leads90.00 min
- p99
- 119.40 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Trails27.64 s
- p99
- 1717.81 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 589
Monad
Leads23.00 s
- p99
- 1119.02 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 54
Frequently asked questions
Arbitrum vs Monad: which one is better?
Arbitrum and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Arbitrum or Monad?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Monad leads at 4.06 s versus Arbitrum at 1067.65 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Arbitrum vs Monad comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.