Avalanche vs dRPC

Avalanche leads on both live benchmarks. Avalanche wins on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (179 ms vs 214 ms), Fastest free Avalanche RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (179 ms vs 203 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Avalanche logo
Avalanche

Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.

dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (plus Solana and Polkadot)

RPCs

Avalanche

Leads

179 ms

p99
339 ms
rank
#2
samples
4,318

dRPC

Trails

214 ms

p99
580 ms
rank
#4
samples
263,087

Latency is conditional on success: the harness times only calls returning a valid fresh block, so a mostly-failing endpoint can post a fast p50. Rows below 50 percent success are degraded; unresponsive probes pin below the table. The All chains aggregate favours single-chain foundation endpoints (Base, Binance, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche officials) since they rank on one chain only; use a chain tab for honest comparison. Dead endpoints (cloudflare-eth POST returns -32603) are excluded.

Frequently asked questions

Avalanche vs dRPC: which one is better?

Avalanche and dRPC are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Avalanche or dRPC?

On the Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains benchmark, Avalanche leads at 179 ms versus dRPC at 214 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Avalanche vs dRPC comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.