OpenChainBench

Avalanche vs Ink

Avalanche leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks, Ink on 0. Avalanche wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.29 s vs 10.00 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (47.85 s vs 48.75 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Avalanche logo
Avalanche

Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.

Ink logo
Ink

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Avalanche vs Ink: which one is better?

Avalanche and Ink are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Avalanche or Ink?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Avalanche leads at 7.29 s versus Ink at 10.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Avalanche vs Ink comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.