OpenChainBench

Avalanche vs Ink

Avalanche leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Avalanche wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.46 s vs 7.50 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (42.86 s vs 22.7 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (30.81 s vs 43.93 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Avalanche logo
Avalanche

Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.

Ink logo
Ink

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Avalanche vs Ink: which one is better?

Avalanche and Ink are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Avalanche or Ink?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Avalanche leads at 4.46 s (provisional) versus Ink at 7.50 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Avalanche vs Ink comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.