Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails7.19 s
- p99
- 14.45 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 33
Monad
Leads4.17 s
- p99
- 9.84 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 26
Avalanche vs Monad
Avalanche leads on 0 of 3 shared benchmarks, Monad on 3. Monad wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.17 s vs 7.19 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (90.00 s vs 105.01 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (23.08 s vs 48.76 s).
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails105.01 min
- p99
- 294.00 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 5
Monad
Leads90.00 min
- p99
- 119.40 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails48.76 s
- p99
- 117.43 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 43
Monad
Leads23.08 s
- p99
- 1062.02 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 46
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Monad: which one is better?
Avalanche and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Avalanche or Monad?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Monad leads at 4.17 s versus Avalanche at 7.19 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Monad comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.