Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails4.25 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 60provisional
Monad
Leads3.50 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 36provisional
Avalanche vs Monad
Avalanche leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Monad on 1. Avalanche wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (46.66 s vs 1.6 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (35.00 s vs 43.85 s). Monad wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.50 s vs 4.25 s).
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesAvalanche
Leads46.66 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 20provisional
Monad
Trails1.6 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 55provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Leads35.00 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 85provisional
Monad
Trails43.85 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 64provisional
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Monad: which one is better?
Avalanche and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. Monad leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Avalanche or Monad?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Avalanche leads at 46.66 s (provisional) versus Monad at 1.6 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Avalanche or Monad?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Monad leads at 3.50 s (provisional) versus Avalanche at 4.25 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Monad comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.