Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation
TradingAvalanche
Trails0.092 %
- p99
- 0.24%
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 23,040
Polygon
Leads0.090 %
- p99
- 0.29%
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 23,040
Avalanche leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 2. Avalanche wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.17 s vs 7.43 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (105.01 s vs 750.00 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (49.11 s vs 110.85 s). Polygon wins on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation (0.090% vs 0.092%), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (52.50 s vs 90.00 s).
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Avalanche
Trails0.092 %
Polygon
Leads0.090 %
Avalanche
Leads7.17 s
Polygon
Trails7.43 s
Avalanche
Leads105.01 min
Polygon
Trails750.00 min
Avalanche
Leads49.11 s
Polygon
Trails110.85 min
Avalanche
No data in window
Polygon
Trails12.88 s
Avalanche
Trails90.00 min
Polygon
Leads52.50 s
Avalanche and Polygon are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. Polygon leads on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Avalanche leads at 7.17 s versus Polygon at 7.43 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation benchmark, Polygon leads at 0.090% versus Avalanche at 0.092%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.