Bitget vs Bybit 2026: 2 live benchmarks compared

Name: Bitget vs Bybit OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

OpenChainBench

Bitget vs Bybit

Split decision: Bitget leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0064% vs 0.030%); Bybit leads on Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live (27.3 bps vs 50.6 bps). Data as of 2026-10-30 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 30 Oct 2026 17:31:39 UTCWindow: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks

Bitget

Centralised exchange with a USDT-margined perpetual futures book (Bitget Futures). On OpenChainBench as a reference row: volume, open interest and market count as reported to CoinGecko, funding from the Mobula feed.

Bybit

Bybit is one of the largest centralized derivatives exchanges, with USDT-margined linear perpetuals on hundreds of pairs and funding settled on 8 hour (some pairs 4 hour) periods.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Bitget

Leads

0.0064 %

p99: 0.023%
rank: #1
samples: 2,878

Bybit

Trails

0.030 %

p99: 0.029%
rank: #12
samples: 2,878

24h ETH funding stddev

Bitgetn/aBybitn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Bitget

Trails

50.6 bps

p99: 41.0 bps
rank: #14
samples: 702

Bybit

Leads

27.3 bps

p99: 17.5 bps
rank: #3
samples: 702

Funding paid, 30d ETH long

Bitgetn/aBybitn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Frequently asked questions

Bitget vs Bybit: which one is better?

Bitget and Bybit are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Bitget leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. Bybit leads on Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on 24h eth funding stddev, Bitget or Bybit?

On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, Bitget leads at 0.0064% versus Bybit at 0.030%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on funding paid, 30d eth long, Bitget or Bybit?

On the Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live benchmark, Bybit leads at 27.3 bps versus Bitget at 50.6 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Bitget vs Bybit comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.