Blockdaemon vs dRPC

dRPC leads on both live benchmarks. dRPC wins on Arc RPC endpoints (40 ms vs 84 ms), Most requests a free RPC plan buys, across 13 providers (10.50M vs 191.7K). Data as of 2026-11-05 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Blockdaemon logo
Blockdaemon

Institutional node infrastructure across 50+ chains, normally key-gated. On Arc it also serves the keyless endpoint the chain's docs publish (rpc.blockdaemon.mainnet.arc.io), which is what this cohort measures.

dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Side by side measurements

Most requests a free RPC plan buys, across 13 providers

RPCs

Blockdaemon

Trails

191.7K

rank
#9

dRPC

Leads

10.50M

rank
#1
Free allowance
Blockdaemonn/adRPCn/a

Allowance, not latency and not reliability. A plan that buys the most requests is not thereby the fastest or the most correct; those are measured on the per-chain RPC pages. Published allowances, human-verified against each provider's own pricing page with the date it was read. A free plan is one that costs nothing and renews, so Quicknode's one-month trial is not here. Where a provider publishes a daily cap it is multiplied by 30.

Frequently asked questions

Blockdaemon vs dRPC: which one is better?

Blockdaemon and dRPC are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dRPC leads on Arc RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Blockdaemon or dRPC?

On the Arc RPC endpoints benchmark, dRPC leads at 40 ms versus Blockdaemon at 84 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Blockdaemon vs dRPC comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.