OpenChainBench

BNB vs Celo

BNB leads on both live benchmarks. BNB wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (27.33 s vs 42.95 s), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (1.0 min vs 27.5 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
BNB logo
BNB

Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.

Celo logo
Celo

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

BNB vs Celo: which one is better?

BNB and Celo are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, BNB or Celo?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, BNB leads at 27.33 s versus Celo at 42.95 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BNB vs Celo comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.