OpenChainBench

BNB vs Celo

BNB leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks, Celo on 0. BNB wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (5.54 s vs 1050.00 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (28.44 s vs 47.48 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
BNB logo
BNB

Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.

Celo logo
Celo

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

BNB vs Celo: which one is better?

BNB and Celo are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, BNB or Celo?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, BNB leads at 5.54 s versus Celo at 1050.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BNB vs Celo comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.