Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBNB
Leads3.99 s
- p99
- 13.77 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 963
Monad
Trails5.11 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 59provisional
BNB vs Monad
BNB leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Monad on 1. BNB wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.99 s vs 5.11 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (26.81 s vs 51.43 s). Monad wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.6 min vs 1.7 min).
BNB
Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesBNB
Trails1.7 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 82provisional
Monad
Leads1.6 min
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 13provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBNB
Leads26.81 s
- p99
- 7.0 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 841
Monad
Trails51.43 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 50provisional
Frequently asked questions
BNB vs Monad: which one is better?
BNB and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. Monad leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, BNB or Monad?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, BNB leads at 3.99 s versus Monad at 5.11 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, BNB or Monad?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Monad leads at 1.6 min (provisional) versus BNB at 1.7 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BNB vs Monad comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.