BNB vs Polygon

BNB leads on all 5 live benchmarks. BNB wins on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation (0.020% vs 0.041%), Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.80 s vs 4.70 s), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.2 min vs 12.5 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (27.47 s vs 1.8 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
BNB logo
BNB

Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.

Side by side measurements

Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation

Trading

BNB

Leads

0.020 %

p99
0.078%
rank
#6
samples
11,520

Polygon

Trails

0.041 %

p99
0.24%
rank
#10
samples
11,520

Three caveats. (1) Lower is better, but a non-zero floor (~5-20 bps) is normal, ticker last-traded prices have micro-jitter and Chainlink updates only on deviation/heartbeat. (2) XRP, ADA, DOGE measured on 3 sources because Chainlink deprecated those USD feeds on Ethereum mainnet, tag flags it. (3) POL/USD is the post-migration symbol for MATIC; we point at POLUSDT (not the frozen legacy MATICUSDT).

Rolling 24h · Max cross-oracle deviationRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

BNB vs Polygon: which one is better?

BNB and Polygon are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, BNB or Polygon?

On the Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation benchmark, BNB leads at 0.020% versus Polygon at 0.041%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BNB vs Polygon comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.