Bitcoin vs Ethereum

Split decision: Bitcoin leads on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation (0.040% vs 0.041%); Ethereum leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains (15.9 min vs 53.5 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Side by side measurements

Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation

Trading

Bitcoin

Leads

0.040 %

p99
0.11%
rank
#1
samples
11,520

Ethereum

Trails

0.041 %

p99
0.12%
rank
#2
samples
11,520

Three caveats. (1) Lower is better, but a non-zero floor (~5-20 bps) is normal, ticker last-traded prices have micro-jitter and Chainlink updates only on deviation/heartbeat. (2) XRP, ADA, DOGE measured on 3 sources because Chainlink deprecated those USD feeds on Ethereum mainnet, tag flags it. (3) POL/USD is the post-migration symbol for MATIC; we point at POLUSDT (not the frozen legacy MATICUSDT).

Rolling 24h · Max cross-oracle deviationRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Bitcoin vs Ethereum: which one is better?

Bitcoin and Ethereum are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Bitcoin leads on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation. Ethereum leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Bitcoin or Ethereum?

On the Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation benchmark, Bitcoin leads at 0.040% versus Ethereum at 0.041%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Bitcoin or Ethereum?

On the Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains benchmark, Ethereum leads at 15.9 min versus Bitcoin at 53.5 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Bitcoin vs Ethereum comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.