Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked
TradingBybit
Trails0.0074 %
- p99
- 0.0084%
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 2,880
Gate
Leads0.0041 %
- p99
- 0.0083%
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 5,760
Bybit vs Gate
Bybit leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Gate on 1. Gate wins on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0041% vs 0.0074%).
Bybit
Bybit is one of the largest centralized derivatives exchanges, with USDT-margined linear perpetuals on hundreds of pairs and funding settled on 8 hour (some pairs 4 hour) periods.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Bybit vs Gate: which one is better?
Bybit and Gate are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gate leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on perp dex funding stability, 24h stddev of eth funding ranked, Bybit or Gate?
On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, Gate leads at 0.0041% versus Bybit at 0.0074%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Bybit vs Gate comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.