Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails14.0 min
- p99
- 19.9 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 385
Celo vs Ethereum
Split decision: Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.50 s vs 4.1 min); Ethereum leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (17.3 min vs 26.0 min).
Ethereum
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails16.9 min
- p99
- 25.4 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 228
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Leads43.50 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 28provisional
Ethereum
Trails4.1 min
- p99
- 19.5 min
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 1,254
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesCelo
Trails26.0 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 6provisional
Ethereum
Leads17.3 min
- p99
- 34.9 min
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 102
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Ethereum: which one is better?
Celo and Ethereum are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Ethereum leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Ethereum?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 43.50 s (provisional) versus Ethereum at 4.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Celo or Ethereum?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Ethereum leads at 17.3 min versus Celo at 26.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Ethereum comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.