Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
Trails20.0 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 2provisional
Ink
Leads7.67 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 31provisional
Celo vs Ink
Split decision: Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (13.52 s vs 55.50 s); Ink leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.67 s vs 20.0 min).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Ink
Trails22.7 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 38provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Leads13.52 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 75provisional
Ink
Trails55.50 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 23provisional
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Ink: which one is better?
Celo and Ink are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Ink leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Ink?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 13.52 s (provisional) versus Ink at 55.50 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Celo or Ink?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Ink leads at 7.67 s (provisional) versus Celo at 20.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Ink comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.