OpenChainBench

Celo vs Mantle

Celo leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Mantle on 0. Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (47.48 s vs 98.57 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Celo logo
Celo
Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Celo vs Mantle: which one is better?

Celo and Mantle are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Celo or Mantle?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 47.48 s versus Mantle at 98.57 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Celo vs Mantle comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.