Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Monad
Trails3.47 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 50provisional
Celo vs Monad
Monad leads on the only live benchmark. Monad wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.75 s vs 45.00 s).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Monad
Trails1.6 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 64provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Trails45.00 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 24provisional
Monad
Leads43.75 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 69provisional
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Monad: which one is better?
Celo and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Monad?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Monad leads at 43.75 s (provisional) versus Celo at 45.00 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Monad comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.