OpenChainBench

Celo vs Monad

Celo leads on 0 of 2 shared benchmarks, Monad on 2. Monad wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.17 s vs 1050.00 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (22.88 s vs 47.48 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Celo logo
Celo
Monad logo
Monad

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Celo vs Monad: which one is better?

Celo and Monad are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Celo or Monad?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Monad leads at 4.17 s versus Celo at 1050.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Celo vs Monad comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.