Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Optimism
Trails17.5 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 1provisional
Celo vs Optimism
Split decision: Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (42.95 s vs 1.1 min); Optimism leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (25.0 min vs 27.5 min).
Optimism
Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Optimism
Trails19.2 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 5provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Leads42.95 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 29provisional
Optimism
Trails1.1 min
- p99
- 19.6 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 809
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesCelo
Trails27.5 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 3provisional
Optimism
Leads25.0 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 16provisional
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Optimism: which one is better?
Celo and Optimism are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Optimism leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Optimism?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 42.95 s (provisional) versus Optimism at 1.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Celo or Optimism?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Optimism leads at 25.0 min (provisional) versus Celo at 27.5 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Optimism comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.