Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
Trails1050.00 min
- p99
- 1197.00 s
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 1
Polygon
Leads7.42 s
- p99
- 14.68 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 191
Celo leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 1. Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (47.48 s vs 111.74 s). Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.42 s vs 1050.00 s).
Celo
Trails1050.00 min
Polygon
Leads7.42 s
Celo
No data in window
Polygon
Trails750.00 min
Celo
Leads47.48 s
Polygon
Trails111.74 min
Celo
No data in window
Polygon
Trails12.97 s
Celo
No data in window
Polygon
Trails55.49 s
Celo and Polygon are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 47.48 s versus Polygon at 111.74 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 7.42 s versus Celo at 1050.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.