Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Polygon
Trails4.55 s
- p99
- 14.27 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 161
Celo vs Polygon
Split decision: Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (42.95 s vs 1.7 min); Polygon leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (43.93 s vs 25.0 min).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Polygon
Trails12.5 min
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 4provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Leads42.95 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 29provisional
Polygon
Trails1.7 min
- p99
- 19.7 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 319
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesCelo
Trails25.0 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 6provisional
Polygon
Leads43.93 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 27provisional
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Polygon: which one is better?
Celo and Polygon are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Polygon leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Polygon?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 42.95 s (provisional) versus Polygon at 1.7 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Celo or Polygon?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Polygon leads at 43.93 s (provisional) versus Celo at 25.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Polygon comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.