Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
Trails20.0 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 2provisional
Polygon
Leads6.14 s
- p99
- 14.57 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 137
Celo vs Polygon
Celo leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 2. Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (13.52 s vs 1.8 min). Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (6.14 s vs 20.0 min), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (47.50 s vs 30.0 min).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Polygon
Trails12.5 min
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 6provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Leads13.52 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 75provisional
Polygon
Trails1.8 min
- p99
- 19.6 min
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 149
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesCelo
Trails30.0 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 2provisional
Polygon
Leads47.50 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 23provisional
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Polygon: which one is better?
Celo and Polygon are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Polygon?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 13.52 s (provisional) versus Polygon at 1.8 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Celo or Polygon?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 6.14 s versus Celo at 20.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Polygon comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.