OpenChainBench

Celo vs Scroll

Celo leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Scroll on 0. Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (47.48 s vs 223.65 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Celo logo
Celo
Scroll logo
Scroll

Native bytecode-equivalent zkEVM rollup. Sequencer cadence is prover-bound: empty periods see longer gaps between blocks while busy minutes produce blocks at a sub-3-second rate.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Celo vs Scroll: which one is better?

Celo and Scroll are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Celo or Scroll?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 47.48 s versus Scroll at 223.65 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Celo vs Scroll comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.