OpenChainBench

Celo vs Scroll

Celo leads on the only live benchmark. Celo wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (42.95 s vs 3.0 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Celo logo
Celo
Scroll logo
Scroll

Native bytecode-equivalent zkEVM rollup. Sequencer cadence is prover-bound: empty periods see longer gaps between blocks while busy minutes produce blocks at a sub-3-second rate.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Celo vs Scroll: which one is better?

Celo and Scroll are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Celo or Scroll?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 42.95 s (provisional) versus Scroll at 3.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Celo vs Scroll comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.