Chainstack vs QuickNode

QuickNode leads on all 9 live benchmarks. QuickNode wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (28 ms vs 30 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (28 ms vs 42 ms), Base RPC endpoints (27 ms vs 30 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (26 ms vs 29 ms). Data as of 2026-10-08 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h9 shared benchmarks

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Chainstack vs QuickNode: which one is better?

Chainstack and QuickNode are compared on 9 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. QuickNode leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Chainstack or QuickNode?

On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, QuickNode leads at 28 ms versus Chainstack at 30 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Chainstack vs QuickNode comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.