OpenChainBench

Chainstack vs Dwellir

Chainstack leads on all 8 live benchmarks. Chainstack wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (60 ms vs 374 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (72 ms vs 442 ms), Base RPC endpoints (32 ms vs 244 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (60 ms vs 373 ms). Data as of 2026-10-09 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h8 shared benchmarks
Chainstack logo
Chainstack

Managed blockchain node platform. Deploys dedicated Global Nodes per chain with keyed HTTPS/WSS endpoints; free plan includes one node and 3M requests per month.

Dwellir logo
Dwellir

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Chainstack vs Dwellir: which one is better?

Chainstack and Dwellir are compared on 8 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Chainstack leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Chainstack or Dwellir?

On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, Chainstack leads at 60 ms versus Dwellir at 374 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Chainstack vs Dwellir comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.