Fastest Robinhood Chain RPC with API key: Chainstack vs Alchemy vs QuickNode
RPCsChainstack
Leads30 ms
- rank
- #2
QuickNode
Trails70 ms
- rank
- #3
Per region
| Region | Chainstack | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 5 ms | 71 ms |
| US-West | 40 ms | 67 ms |
Chainstack vs QuickNode
Chainstack leads on the only live benchmark. Chainstack wins on Fastest Robinhood Chain RPC with API key (30 ms vs 70 ms).
Chainstack
Managed blockchain node platform. Deploys dedicated Global Nodes per chain with keyed HTTPS/WSS endpoints; free plan includes one node and 3M requests per month.
QuickNode
Keyed RPC infrastructure across 30+ chains. Endpoint-scoped API tokens; free and paid plans are served from the same shared fleet, dedicated clusters on higher tiers.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Chainstack vs QuickNode: which one is better?
Chainstack and QuickNode are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Chainstack leads on Fastest Robinhood Chain RPC with API key. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Chainstack or QuickNode?
On the Fastest Robinhood Chain RPC with API key benchmark, Chainstack leads at 30 ms versus QuickNode at 70 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Chainstack vs QuickNode comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.