Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking
AggregatorsCoinStats
Leads150
- p99
- 150
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 150
Serialized
Trails19
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 19provisional
Split decision: CoinStats leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking (150 vs 19); Serialized leads on Crypto price API accuracy (7.16 bps vs 10.2 bps). Data as of 2026-10-23 UTC.
Portfolio tracker and market data API. REST endpoints for prices, exchanges, NFTs, and wallet balances across 100+ blockchains. Consumer app + paid API tiers.
Onchain market data and token security API for trading apps. Own indexers across 18 EVM chains plus Solana, REST plus a single-connection WebSocket for trades and token updates.
CoinStats
Leads150
Serialized
Trails19
CoinStats
Trails10.2 bps
Serialized
Leads7.16 bps
The figure is the gap between what a price API printed and what the exchanges were quoting when the answer arrived, so it bundles two things: how the API builds its price and how old that price is. A feed refreshed every minute carries up to a minute of market drift into its gap, and that is intended, because it is what a reader of the API receives. The signed bias column separates a constant offset from noise.
CoinStats and Serialized are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. CoinStats leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking. Serialized leads on Crypto price API accuracy. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking benchmark, CoinStats leads at 150 versus Serialized at 19 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Crypto price API accuracy benchmark, Serialized leads at 7.16 bps versus CoinStats at 10.2 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.