Conduit vs dRPC

Conduit leads on the only live benchmark. Conduit wins on Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (177 ms vs 331 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Conduit vs dRPC: which one is better?

Conduit and dRPC are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Conduit leads on Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Conduit or dRPC?

On the Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Conduit leads at 177 ms versus dRPC at 331 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Conduit vs dRPC comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.