Conduit vs dRPC

Conduit leads on the only live benchmark. Conduit wins on Zora RPC endpoints (144 ms vs 311 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Side by side measurements

Zora RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

RPCs

Conduit

Leads

144 ms

p99
178 ms
rank
#2
samples
4,319

dRPC

Trails

311 ms

p99
600 ms
rank
#3
samples
4,320

Per region

RegionConduitdRPC
US-East81 ms313 ms
EU-West169 ms265 ms
Singapore182 ms354 ms
RPC latency
Conduitn/adRPCn/a

Frequently asked questions

Conduit vs dRPC: which one is better?

Conduit and dRPC are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Conduit leads on Zora RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Conduit or dRPC?

On the Zora RPC endpoints benchmark, Conduit leads at 144 ms versus dRPC at 311 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Conduit vs dRPC comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.