Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsConduit
Leads173 ms
- p99
- 228 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 661
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Conduit | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 172 ms | 561 ms |
| EU-West | 173 ms | 566 ms |
| Singapore | 173 ms | 559 ms |
Conduit vs Thirdweb
Conduit leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Conduit wins on Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (173 ms vs 564 ms).
CO
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Conduit vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Conduit and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Conduit leads on Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free zora rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Conduit or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Zora RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Conduit leads at 173 ms versus Thirdweb at 564 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Conduit vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.