Conduit leads on both live benchmarks. Conduit wins on Zora RPC endpoints (138 ms vs 480 ms), Katana RPC endpoints (135 ms vs 479 ms). Data as of 2026-11-02 UTC.
Rollup-as-a-service platform that deploys and operates OP Stack and Arbitrum Orbit chains, including the public RPC endpoints for several of the networks it hosts.
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Conduit
Leads138 ms
thirdweb
Trails480 ms
Per region
| Region | Conduit | thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 73 ms | 299 ms |
| EU-West | 151 ms | 547 ms |
| Singapore | 192 ms | 594 ms |
Conduit
Leads135 ms
thirdweb
Trails479 ms
Per region
| Region | Conduit | thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 71 ms | 300 ms |
| EU-West | 150 ms | 537 ms |
| Singapore | 184 ms | 600 ms |
Conduit and thirdweb are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Conduit leads on Zora RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Zora RPC endpoints benchmark, Conduit leads at 138 ms versus thirdweb at 480 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.