DRIFT vs GMX

Name: DRIFT vs GMX OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

GMX leads on the only live benchmark. GMX wins on Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 (9.67x vs 25.6x).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:27:52 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

DRIFT

Solana perp DEX with hybrid AMM/orderbook model, sub-second matching via Anchor program.

GMX

Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, GNS live

Trading

DRIFT

Trails

25.6x

rank: #3
samples: 26provisional

GMX

Leads

9.67x

rank: #2
samples: 10provisional

P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.

Frequently asked questions

DRIFT vs GMX: which one is better?

DRIFT and GMX are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMX leads on Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, DRIFT or GMX?

On the Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 benchmark, GMX leads at 9.67x (provisional) versus DRIFT at 25.6x (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the DRIFT vs GMX comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

GMX vs Hyperliquid

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.