dRPC vs OnFinality

OnFinality leads on the only live benchmark. OnFinality wins on Fastest free Monad RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (127 ms vs 187 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

OnFinality logo
OnFinality

Multi-chain infrastructure provider. Public keyless endpoints on 80+ networks with generous daily limits, plus dedicated and API-key tiers.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs OnFinality: which one is better?

dRPC and OnFinality are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. OnFinality leads on Fastest free Monad RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, dRPC or OnFinality?

On the Fastest free Monad RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, OnFinality leads at 127 ms versus dRPC at 187 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs OnFinality comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.