dRPC vs OnFinality

OnFinality leads on all 3 live benchmarks. OnFinality wins on Monad RPC endpoints (89 ms vs 138 ms), Fastest Ethereum WebSocket newHeads push, live block-push lag across RPC providers (222 ms vs 658 ms), Kusama RPC endpoints (48 ms vs 448 ms). Data as of 2026-10-07 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks, 3 measured on both sides
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

OnFinality logo
OnFinality

Multi-chain infrastructure provider. Public keyless endpoints on 80+ networks with generous daily limits, plus dedicated and API-key tiers.

Side by side measurements

Monad RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

RPCs

dRPC

Trails

138 ms

p99
232 ms
rank
#4
samples
4,318

OnFinality

Leads

89 ms

p99
1.16 s
rank
#2
samples
4,319

Per region

RegiondRPCOnFinality
US-East164 ms16 ms
EU-West60 ms103 ms
Singapore189 ms149 ms
RPC latency
dRPCn/aOnFinalityn/a

Kusama RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency

RPCs

dRPC

Trails

448 ms

p99
733 ms
rank
#3
samples
4,321

OnFinality

Leads

48 ms

p99
1.06 s
rank
#1
samples
4,320

Per region

RegiondRPCOnFinality
US-East531 ms5 ms
EU-West97 ms91 ms
Singapore714 ms49 ms
RPC latency
dRPCn/aOnFinalityn/a

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs OnFinality: which one is better?

dRPC and OnFinality are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. OnFinality leads on Monad RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, dRPC or OnFinality?

On the Monad RPC endpoints benchmark, OnFinality leads at 89 ms versus dRPC at 138 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs OnFinality comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.