dRPC leads on all 3 live benchmarks. dRPC wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (29 ms vs 83 ms), Optimism RPC endpoints (108 ms vs 111 ms), Polygon RPC endpoints (33 ms vs 93 ms). Data as of 2026-11-11 UTC.
Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.
Thyme Labs operates keyless public RPC on its own nodes with a 22-unit/s per-IP limit (one unit per call; eth_getLogs and eth_getBlockReceipts cost four), batches of up to 10 calls and no paid-provider fallback.
dRPC
Leads29 ms
Thyme Gate
Trails83 ms
Per region
| Region | dRPC | Thyme Gate |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 43 ms | 85 ms |
| EU-West | 29 ms | 8 ms |
| Singapore | 15 ms | 157 ms |
dRPC
Leads108 ms
Thyme Gate
Trails111 ms
Per region
| Region | dRPC | Thyme Gate |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 67 ms | 112 ms |
| EU-West | 37 ms | 37 ms |
| Singapore | 221 ms | 184 ms |
dRPC
Leads33 ms
Thyme Gate
Trails93 ms
Per region
| Region | dRPC | Thyme Gate |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 52 ms | 94 ms |
| EU-West | 27 ms | 17 ms |
| Singapore | 20 ms | 167 ms |
dRPC and Thyme Gate are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dRPC leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, dRPC leads at 29 ms versus Thyme Gate at 83 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.