ecostake leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Polkachu on 1. ecostake wins on Cosmos Hub RPC endpoints (140 ms vs 148 ms), Regen Network RPC endpoints (143 ms vs 149 ms). Polkachu wins on Akash Network RPC endpoints (147 ms vs 183 ms). Data as of 2026-11-02 UTC.
Community-run Cosmos validator and public RPC network. Operates no-key Tendermint RPC endpoints across 40+ Cosmos SDK chains (osmosis-rpc.polkachu.com, cosmos-rpc.polkachu.com, etc.) with archive support on a paid tier.
ecostake
Leads140 ms
Polkachu
Trails148 ms
Per region
| Region | ecostake | Polkachu |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 125 ms | 129 ms |
| EU-West | 35 ms | 44 ms |
| Singapore | 259 ms | 269 ms |
ecostake
Trails183 ms
Polkachu
Leads147 ms
Per region
| Region | ecostake | Polkachu |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 165 ms | 129 ms |
| EU-West | 82 ms | 43 ms |
| Singapore | 301 ms | 270 ms |
ecostake
Leads143 ms
Polkachu
Trails149 ms
Per region
| Region | ecostake | Polkachu |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 126 ms | 131 ms |
| EU-West | 36 ms | 45 ms |
| Singapore | 268 ms | 272 ms |
ecostake and Polkachu are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. ecostake leads on Cosmos Hub RPC endpoints. Polkachu leads on Akash Network RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cosmos Hub RPC endpoints benchmark, ecostake leads at 140 ms versus Polkachu at 148 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.
