Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingedgeX
Trails178
- p99
- 178
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 2,880
GRVT
Leads194
- p99
- 194
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,880
Active markets
edgeXn/aGRVTn/a
edgeX vs GRVT
edgeX leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, GRVT on 2. edgeX wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.849x vs 1.047x). GRVT wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (194 vs 178), Perp DEX capital efficiency (6 vs 3). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.
edgeX
StarkEx-settled perp DEX with low taker fees and a documented public REST API.
GRVT
zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live
TradingedgeX
Trails3
- p99
- 3
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 2,880
GRVT
Leads6
- p99
- 6
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,880
Markets per $M TVL
edgeXn/aGRVTn/a
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live
TradingedgeX
Leads0.849x
- p99
- 1.310x
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 2,880
GRVT
Trails1.047x
- p99
- 1.151x
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
edgeXn/aGRVTn/a
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Frequently asked questions
edgeX vs GRVT: which one is better?
edgeX and GRVT are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. edgeX leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. GRVT leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), edgeX or GRVT?
On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, edgeX leads at 0.849x versus GRVT at 1.047x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which has the higher active markets, edgeX or GRVT?
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, GRVT leads at 194 versus edgeX at 178. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the edgeX vs GRVT comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.