edgeX vs Ostium

edgeX leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Ostium on 2. edgeX wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (176 vs 83). Ostium wins on Perp DEX capital efficiency (7 vs 3), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.361x vs 2.63x). Data as of 2026-09-23 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks, 3 measured on both sides
edgeX logo
edgeX

StarkEx-settled perp DEX with low taker fees and a documented public REST API.

Ostium logo
Ostium

Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

edgeX

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#8
samples
2,876

Ostium

Leads

7

p99
7
rank
#3
samples
2,876
Markets per $M TVL
edgeXn/aOstiumn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live

Trading
ProviderFees 30dRevenue 30dOpen interestFees / OI
edgeX$5.05M$3.65M$617.37M0.100x
Ostium$126.4K$36.0K$6.42M0.240x
View
edgeXn/aOstiumn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

edgeX

Trails

2.63x

p99
2.93x
rank
#15
samples
2,797

Ostium

Leads

0.361x

p99
0.579x
rank
#2
samples
2,876
Volume / OI (24h)
edgeXn/aOstiumn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

edgeX vs Ostium: which one is better?

edgeX and Ostium are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. edgeX leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ostium leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, edgeX or Ostium?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, edgeX leads at 176 versus Ostium at 83. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher markets per $m tvl, edgeX or Ostium?

On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, Ostium leads at 7 versus edgeX at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the edgeX vs Ostium comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.