OpenChainBench

Ethereum vs Ink

Ethereum leads on 0 of 3 shared benchmarks, Ink on 3. Ink wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (10.00 s vs 927.54 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (48.75 s vs 248.35 s), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.72 s vs 239.71 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Ink logo
Ink

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ethereum vs Ink: which one is better?

Ethereum and Ink are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ink leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Ethereum or Ink?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Ink leads at 10.00 s versus Ethereum at 927.54 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ethereum vs Ink comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.