Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsEthereum
Leads$0.00669
- p99
- $0.3265
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 20,160
Robinhood Chain
Trails$0.0123
- p99
- $0.0144
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 20,160
Ethereum leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Robinhood Chain on 1. Ethereum wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.00669 vs $0.0123), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (16.9 min vs 17.4 min). Robinhood Chain wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (22.98 s vs 4.1 min).
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Robinhood is a US commission-free investing app with 25M+ funded accounts. It added crypto trading in 2018, launched its own L2 chain (Robinhood Chain) in 2025, and is the #1 most-reviewed financial app on the US App Store with nearly 5 million ratings.
Ethereum
Leads$0.00669
Robinhood Chain
Trails$0.0123
Ethereum
Leads16.9 min
Robinhood Chain
Trails17.4 min
Ethereum
Trails4.1 min
Robinhood Chain
Leads22.98 s
Ethereum and Robinhood Chain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Robinhood Chain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Ethereum leads at $0.00669 versus Robinhood Chain at $0.0123. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Robinhood Chain leads at 22.98 s versus Ethereum at 4.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.