Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsEthereum
Trails$0.00986
- p99
- $0.3554
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 20,159
Robinhood Chain
Leads$0.00398
- p99
- $0.00479
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 20,159
Ethereum leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Robinhood Chain on 2. Ethereum wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (16.9 min vs 17.4 min). Robinhood Chain wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.00398 vs $0.00986), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (23.64 s vs 4.1 min).
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Robinhood is a US commission-free investing app with 25M+ funded accounts. It added crypto trading in 2018, launched its own L2 chain (Robinhood Chain) in 2025, and is the #1 most-reviewed financial app on the US App Store with nearly 5 million ratings.
Ethereum
Trails$0.00986
Robinhood Chain
Leads$0.00398
Ethereum
Leads16.9 min
Robinhood Chain
Trails17.4 min
Ethereum
Trails4.1 min
Robinhood Chain
Leads23.64 s
Ethereum and Robinhood Chain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. Robinhood Chain leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Ethereum leads at 16.9 min versus Robinhood Chain at 17.4 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Robinhood Chain leads at $0.00398 versus Ethereum at $0.00986. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.