Extended vs GMX

Extended leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks, GMX on 2. Extended wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.027% vs 0.060%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($356.79M vs $42.67M), Perp DEX asset breadth (131 vs 8), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($250.10M vs $35.77M). GMX wins on Perp DEX cost invariance (1.000x vs 1.725x), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.709x vs 1.804x). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h7 shared benchmarks, 6 measured on both sides
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

GMX logo
GMX

Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Extended

$1.57B vs $292M

30d lead

Extended

$7.43B vs $1.41B

Days led, last 30

30 / 0

Extended / GMX

Current streak

90 days

Extended since Jul 12, 2026

ExtendedGMX

UTC days, one side per trade

0250M500M750M1BJul 12Oct 9lead

Extended volume ÷ GMX volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

537.8% · week to 9 Oct · median 324.6%

Extended ÷ GMX, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%250%500%750%1000%median 325%26 Jun10 Jul24 Jul7 Aug21 Aug4 Sep18 Sep2 Oct9 Oct

3 Oct to 9 Oct

Extended ÷ GMX537.8%
vs median+213.2pt
= Extended volume$1.57B
÷ GMX volume$292.0M
WindowExtendedGMXExtended / GMX
Last closed day (Oct 9, 2026)$250M$35.8M699%
Last 7 days$1.57B$292M538%
Last 30 days$7.43B$1.41B525%

Sources: Extended, Extended exchange/stats/trading per day, Starknet (Ethereum deployment until 2025-12-29), both sides halved. GMX, GMX V2 synthetics squids, marginVolumeUsd (perps only, swaps excluded), Arbitrum + Avalanche + Botanix + MegaETH. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 9, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Extended

Leads

131

p99
131
rank
#2
samples
2,880

GMX

Trails

8

p99
8
rank
#13
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Extendedn/aGMXn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderFees 30dOpen interestFees / OI
Extended$1.55M$98.43M0.192x
GMX$5.39M$60.38M1.087x
View
Extendedn/aGMXn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Extended$250.10M$7.43B1.96%
GMX$35.77M$1.41B0.37%
View
Extendedn/aGMXn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Rolling 24h · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

1.804x

p99
2.53x
rank
#15
samples
2,880

GMX

Leads

0.709x

p99
1.387x
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aGMXn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs GMX: which one is better?

Extended and GMX are compared on 7 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. GMX leads on Perp DEX cost invariance. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Extended or GMX?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Extended leads at 0.027% versus GMX at 0.060%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the lower cost slope ($1m / $1k), Extended or GMX?

On the Perp DEX cost invariance benchmark, GMX leads at 1.000x versus Extended at 1.725x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs GMX comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.