OpenChainBench

Extended vs GRVT

Extended leads on both live benchmarks. Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($654.28M vs $598.38M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 194).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

GRVT logo
GRVT

zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs GRVT: which one is better?

Extended and GRVT are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or GRVT?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $654.28M versus GRVT at $598.38M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs GRVT comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.