Extended vs GRVT

Split decision: Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($519.82M vs $410.09M) and Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 194); GRVT leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency (6 vs 3) and Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.853x vs 2.60x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

GRVT logo
GRVT

zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#7
samples
2,880

GRVT

Leads

6

p99
6
rank
#4
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Extendedn/aGRVTn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

2.60x

p99
2.78x
rank
#17
samples
2,880

GRVT

Leads

0.853x

p99
0.957x
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aGRVTn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs GRVT: which one is better?

Extended and GRVT are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. GRVT leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or GRVT?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $519.82M versus GRVT at $410.09M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher markets per $m tvl, Extended or GRVT?

On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, GRVT leads at 6 versus Extended at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs GRVT comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.