Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingExtended
Leads$454.52M
- p99
- $555.66M
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 2,880
ORDER
Trails$28.72M
- p99
- $45.30M
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,880
24h perp volume
Extendedn/aORDERn/a
Extended vs ORDER
Extended leads on both live benchmarks. Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($454.52M vs $28.72M), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($273.48M vs $45.30M). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Extended
Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.
ORDER
Orderly Network is a permissionless liquidity layer for on-chain perpetuals. Front-ends (including WOOFi Pro) route orders through a shared CLOB infrastructure deployed across Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base and other chains.
Daily perp volume, head to head
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
Extended
$1.50B vs $405M
30d lead
Extended
$7.28B vs $1.39B
Days led, last 30
30 / 0
Extended / ORDER
Current streak
90 days
Extended since Jul 8, 2026
ExtendedORDER
UTC days, one side per trade
Extended volume ÷ ORDER volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
369.9% · week to 5 Oct · median 522.4%
Extended ÷ ORDER, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
29 Sep to 5 Oct
| Extended ÷ ORDER | 369.9% |
| vs median | -152.4pt |
| = Extended volume | $1.50B |
| ÷ ORDER volume | $405.0M |
| Window | Extended | ORDER | Extended / ORDER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Oct 5, 2026) | $273M | $45.3M | 604% |
| Last 7 days | $1.50B | $405M | 370% |
| Last 30 days | $7.28B | $1.39B | 522% |
Sources: Extended, Extended exchange/stats/trading per day, Starknet (Ethereum deployment until 2025-12-29), both sides halved. ORDER, Orderly Network md/volume/daily_stats, all chains. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 5, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees
Trading| Provider | Fees 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended | $1.54M | $100.88M | 0.186x |
| ORDER | $148.2K | $18.87M | 0.096x |
View
Extendedn/aORDERn/a
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled
Trading| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended | $273.48M | $7.28B | 1.98% |
| ORDER | $45.30M | $1.39B | 0.38% |
View
Extendedn/aORDERn/a
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Frequently asked questions
Extended vs ORDER: which one is better?
Extended and ORDER are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or ORDER?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $454.52M versus ORDER at $28.72M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Extended vs ORDER comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.