Extended vs Ostium

Split decision: Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 83) and Perp DEX asset breadth (131 vs 74); Ostium leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency (19 vs 3) and Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.147x vs 2.11x). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks, 4 measured on both sides
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

Ostium logo
Ostium

Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Extended

Leads

131

p99
131
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Ostium

Trails

74

p99
74
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Extendedn/aOstiumn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#7
samples
2,880

Ostium

Leads

19

p99
19
rank
#2
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Extendedn/aOstiumn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderFees 30dOpen interestFees / OI
Extended$1.55M$98.43M0.192x
Ostium$147.5K$8.59M0.209x
View
Extendedn/aOstiumn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

2.11x

p99
2.56x
rank
#15
samples
2,880

Ostium

Leads

0.147x

p99
0.211x
rank
#2
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aOstiumn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs Ostium: which one is better?

Extended and Ostium are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ostium leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Extended or Ostium?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Extended leads at 326 versus Ostium at 83. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher markets per $m tvl, Extended or Ostium?

On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, Ostium leads at 19 versus Extended at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs Ostium comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.