Extended vs Pacifica

Split decision: Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 77); Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($985.85M vs $655.58M).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

Pacifica logo
Pacifica

Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live

Trading
ProviderFees 30dOpen interestFees / OI
Extended$1.70M$99.84M0.208x
Pacifica$3.57M$58.27M0.746x
View
Extendedn/aPacifican/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs Pacifica: which one is better?

Extended and Pacifica are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Extended or Pacifica?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Extended leads at 326 versus Pacifica at 77. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or Pacifica?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $985.85M versus Extended at $655.58M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs Pacifica comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.