Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingExtended
Leads$611.30M
- p99
- $693.29M
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2,879
StandX
Trails$375.42M
- p99
- $390.70M
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 630
24h perp volume
Extendedn/aStandXn/a
Extended vs StandX
Extended leads on both live benchmarks. Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($611.30M vs $375.42M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 13).
Extended
Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.
ST
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingExtended
Leads326
- p99
- 326
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 2,879
StandX
Trails13
- p99
- 13
- rank
- #21
- samples
- 630
Active markets
Extendedn/aStandXn/a
Frequently asked questions
Extended vs StandX: which one is better?
Extended and StandX are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or StandX?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $611.30M versus StandX at $375.42M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Extended vs StandX comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.