Extended vs StandX

Extended leads on 2 of 5 shared benchmarks, StandX on 3. Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($466.92M vs $42.4K), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (339 vs 13). StandX wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.38 bps vs 3.12 bps), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.013x vs 3.23x), Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live (57.3 bps vs 65.4 bps). Data as of 2026-11-07 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

StandX logo
StandX

StandX is a DUSD-margined perpetuals DEX on BNB Chain (13 markets in 2026-09: majors plus gold, silver, oil and a few equities) with a public market-overview endpoint carrying volume, open interest and hourly funding per market.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Extended

Trails

3.12 bps

p99
3.12 bps
rank
#18
samples
2,880

StandX

Leads

2.38 bps

p99
3.00 bps
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Extendedn/aStandXn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

3.23x

p99
4.21x
rank
#15
samples
2,880

StandX

Leads

0.013x

p99
0.013x
rank
#1
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aStandXn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

65.4 bps

p99
81.7 bps
rank
#19
samples
717

StandX

Leads

57.3 bps

p99
89.9 bps
rank
#17
samples
720
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Extendedn/aStandXn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 30d · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs StandX: which one is better?

Extended and StandX are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. StandX leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or StandX?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $466.92M versus StandX at $42.4K. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Extended or StandX?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, StandX leads at 2.38 bps versus Extended at 3.12 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs StandX comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.