Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingExtended
Leads$631.96M
- p99
- $694.32M
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2,880
Vest
Trails$235.99M
- p99
- $255.33M
- rank
- #15
- samples
- 198
24h perp volume
Extendedn/aVestn/a
Extended vs Vest
Extended leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($631.96M vs $235.99M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 88), Perp DEX asset breadth (131 vs 75).
Extended
Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.
VE
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingExtended
Leads326
- p99
- 326
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 2,880
Vest
Trails88
- p99
- 88
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 198
Active markets
Extendedn/aVestn/a
Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, forex + stocks + indices + commodities
TradingExtended
Leads131
- p99
- 131
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 298
Vest
Trails75
- p99
- 75
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 198
Non-crypto markets
Extendedn/aVestn/a
Market count reflects the Mobula perp pairs catalog at query time. Only mainnet markets are counted (testnets excluded). Asset class tags (forex, stocks, indices, commodities) are assigned by Mobula's editorial taxonomy and updated when new pairs are listed. Venues not in the Mobula catalog (Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, Ostium, Vertex, Paradex, Aster) are monitored separately: their catalogs are crypto-only or verified crypto-only by native API.
Frequently asked questions
Extended vs Vest: which one is better?
Extended and Vest are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or Vest?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $631.96M versus Vest at $235.99M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Extended vs Vest comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.