Gains vs Ondo Perps

Gains leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Ondo Perps on 2. Gains wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (371 vs 65). Ondo Perps wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.035% vs 0.040%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($146.53M vs $102.97M).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Gains logo
Gains

Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.

Ondo Perps logo
Ondo Perps

Ondo Perps is Ondo Finance's perpetuals exchange (live since June 2026): an off-chain matching engine running in Intel SGX enclaves with on-chain custody on Ethereum and Arbitrum, USDC and Ondo tokenized stocks as collateral, and 60+ markets across US equities, ETFs, commodities, indices, FX and crypto.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Gains vs Ondo Perps: which one is better?

Gains and Ondo Perps are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gains leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ondo Perps leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Gains or Ondo Perps?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Gains leads at 371 versus Ondo Perps at 65. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Gains or Ondo Perps?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Ondo Perps leads at 0.035% versus Gains at 0.040%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Gains vs Ondo Perps comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.