Gains vs Ostium

Gains leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks, Ostium on 1. Gains wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (355 vs 83), Perp DEX asset breadth (109 vs 74), Perp DEX capital efficiency (42 vs 19), Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($26.48M vs $1.18M). Ostium wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.162x vs 10.3x). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks, 5 measured on both sides
Gains logo
Gains

Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.

Ostium logo
Ostium

Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Gains

Leads

109

p99
109
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Ostium

Trails

74

p99
74
rank
#7
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Gainsn/aOstiumn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Gains

Leads

42

p99
42
rank
#1
samples
2,880

Ostium

Trails

19

p99
19
rank
#2
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Gainsn/aOstiumn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderFees 30dRevenue 30dOpen interestFees / OI
Gains$781.6K$585.1K$2.61M3.64x
Ostium$147.5K$28.3K$8.59M0.209x
View
Gainsn/aOstiumn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Gains

Trails

10.3x

p99
11.9x
rank
#20
samples
2,880

Ostium

Leads

0.162x

p99
0.218x
rank
#2
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Gainsn/aOstiumn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Gains vs Ostium: which one is better?

Gains and Ostium are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gains leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ostium leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Gains or Ostium?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Gains leads at 355 versus Ostium at 83. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), Gains or Ostium?

On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, Ostium leads at 0.162x versus Gains at 10.3x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Gains vs Ostium comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.