Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingGains
Leads355
- p99
- 355
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,880
Ostium
Trails83
- p99
- 83
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 2,880
Gains leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks, Ostium on 1. Gains wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (355 vs 83), Perp DEX asset breadth (109 vs 74), Perp DEX capital efficiency (42 vs 19), Perp AMM volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($26.48M vs $1.18M). Ostium wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.162x vs 10.3x). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.
Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.
Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.
Gains
Leads355
Ostium
Trails83
Gains
Leads109
Ostium
Trails74
Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.
Gains
Leads42
Ostium
Trails19
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
Gains
Leads$26.48M
Ostium
Trails$1.18M
| Provider | Fees 30d | Revenue 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gains | $781.6K | $585.1K | $2.61M | 3.64x |
| Ostium | $147.5K | $28.3K | $8.59M | 0.209x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Gains
Trails10.3x
Ostium
Leads0.162x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Gains and Ostium are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gains leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ostium leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Gains leads at 355 versus Ostium at 83. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, Ostium leads at 0.162x versus Gains at 10.3x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.