GetBlock vs QuickNode

GetBlock leads on 8 of 9 shared benchmarks, QuickNode on 1. GetBlock wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (10 ms vs 28 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (8 ms vs 29 ms), Base RPC endpoints (9 ms vs 28 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (9 ms vs 27 ms). QuickNode wins on Hyperliquid RPC endpoints (28 ms vs 83 ms). Data as of 2026-09-30 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h9 shared benchmarks
GetBlock logo
GetBlock

Multi-chain RPC provider covering 130+ networks, billed in Compute Units. Keyed JSON-RPC runs on shared nodes with the serving region selectable between New York, Frankfurt and Singapore. Cost is a chain multiplier times a method multiplier, with archive priced from an independent column rather than as a fixed surcharge.

QuickNode logo
QuickNode

Keyed RPC infrastructure across 30+ chains. Endpoint-scoped API tokens; free and paid plans are served from the same shared fleet, dedicated clusters on higher tiers.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

GetBlock vs QuickNode: which one is better?

GetBlock and QuickNode are compared on 9 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GetBlock leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. QuickNode leads on Hyperliquid RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on rpc latency, GetBlock or QuickNode?

On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, GetBlock leads at 10 ms versus QuickNode at 28 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the GetBlock vs QuickNode comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.